The nonsense of Israeli settlements


I consider myself quite fair and even minded. In the conflict between Israel and the Palestinians I think both sides are entitled to a certain degree of truth on their arguments. 

However, in the case of the settlements, for me is a no brainer: they are an obstacle towards peace or a two state solution -whatever comes first.

Some time ago I was talking about the conflict with an American Jew from in New Jersey. It was a nice, polite and civilized conversation with an educated woman. Towards the end, we started talking about the settlements; me against, she in favor.

When all the reasons for her positions were met by me with solid arguments against it based on international law and common sense, this educated woman had no option but to admit they were fair.

- So, why Israel keeps building them? -I asked.
- Because we can.

That completely got me off guard. Coming from an educated person, I insist, who had admitted the settlements were an obstacle for peace and against all common sense and international law was even more shocking.

Photo by: pinky_again/flickr
But that seems to summarize the position of the present Israeli government. They are doing it because they can

They have their backs safe with the support of the US and they are the regional superpower in military terms. And until that changes, no matter how many UN actions are taken. Israel will continue to occupy what they see as theirs by the right of God*.

*And this on itself could give us enough to talk for ages.

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
  • RSS

0 Response to "The nonsense of Israeli settlements"